Trump Likely Would Have Faced Conviction for Election Interference, Special Counsel Report Finds

Jan. 15, 2025, 7:34 am ET

Instant Insight

30-Second Take

  • Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report indicates that former President Donald Trump would have likely been convicted for his role in interfering with the 2020 presidential election if not for recent legal developments.
  • The investigation focused on Trump’s efforts to overturn the election results, including pressuring Vice President Mike Pence and spreading unfounded voter fraud claims.
  • The cases were ultimately dropped following a Supreme Court ruling and Trump’s re-election, but the report details extensive evidence of election interference.

+ Dive Deeper

Quick Brief

2-Minute Digest

Essential Context

In November 2022, Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed Special Counsel Jack Smith to oversee investigations into former President Donald Trump’s actions related to the 2020 presidential election. The investigations included Trump’s attempts to overturn the election results and his retention of classified documents.

Core Players

  • Donald Trump – Former President of the United States
  • Jack Smith – Special Counsel appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland
  • Mike Pence – Former Vice President of the United States
  • Merrick Garland – Attorney General of the United States

Key Numbers

  • November 2022: Special Counsel Jack Smith was appointed.
  • July 1, 2024: Supreme Court ruling granted Trump some immunity from criminal prosecution for actions taken to overturn the 2020 election results.
  • Over 1,000: Convictions of individuals involved in the January 6th Capitol storming.
  • 5: Unidentified co-conspirators mentioned in the public release document who were not yet charged.

+ Full Analysis

Full Depth

Complete Coverage

The Catalyst

The special counsel’s report was released in the early hours of January 14, 2024, detailing extensive evidence of Trump’s efforts to interfere with the 2020 presidential election. This included pressure on Vice President Mike Pence to reject electoral certificates and declare Trump the winner.

“The worst thing Trump did was to try to incite a violent insurrection to overturn the results of a lawful election,” a key point highlighted in the report.

Inside Forces

The investigation revealed a relentless campaign by Trump to coerce Pence into helping him retain the presidency. Despite the lack of evidence, Trump continued to allege widespread voter fraud, which was refuted by federal, state, and local election officials.

The Department of Justice, under Attorney General William Barr, also found no evidence of significant voter fraud that could have changed the election outcome.

Power Dynamics

The relationship between Trump and key figures like Pence and Barr played a crucial role. Trump’s pressure on Pence was part of a larger strategy to overturn the election, which was met with resistance from Barr and other senior government lawyers.

Trump’s actions led to significant internal conflicts, with some senior government lawyers threatening to resign if Trump’s demands were met.

Outside Impact

The broader implications of Trump’s actions are profound. The January 6th Capitol storming, which Trump’s efforts helped incite, resulted in over 1,000 convictions. Trump has indicated he may pardon many of these defendants, which could further polarize public opinion.

The Supreme Court’s ruling granting Trump some immunity from criminal prosecution for his election-related actions has also raised questions about the limits of presidential power and the rule of law.

Future Forces

Looking ahead, the outcome of these investigations and the subsequent legal developments will shape the political and legal landscape. Potential future charges against co-conspirators and the impact of Trump’s re-election on the justice system remain significant factors.

The report’s findings and the legal battles surrounding Trump’s actions will continue to influence discussions on election integrity and the accountability of public officials.

Data Points

  • November 3, 2020: The 2020 U.S. presidential election took place.
  • November 7, 2020: The Associated Press declared Joe Biden the winner.
  • January 2, 2021: Trump and his attorneys urged legislators to overturn election results in swing states.
  • January 6, 2021: The Capitol was stormed as Congress was certifying the electoral votes.
  • July 1, 2024: Supreme Court ruling on Trump’s immunity from prosecution.

The saga surrounding Trump’s interference in the 2020 election highlights critical issues of presidential power, election integrity, and the rule of law. As the country moves forward, these themes will continue to be central in political and legal discourse.