U.S. Relocates All Migrants From Guantanamo Bay

Mar. 13, 2025, 2:36 pm ET

Instant Insight

30-Second Take

  • The U.S. has cleared out all migrants from Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, after a short-lived and costly operation.
  • ICE spent $16 million on the migrant camp, which did not meet required standards.
  • The migrants have been relocated to Louisiana to await deportation.

+ Dive Deeper

Quick Brief

2-Minute Digest

Essential Context

In late January, President Trump announced plans to use Guantanamo Bay to house migrants slated for deportation, labeling the facility as the “perfect place” for holding “the worst of the worst” criminals. However, the operation has been criticized for its high costs and inefficiencies.

Core Players

  • President Trump – President of the United States
  • ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) – Agency responsible for migrant operations
  • Department of Homeland Security – Oversees ICE and deportation efforts
  • Department of Defense – Involved in setting up and maintaining the migrant camp at Guantanamo Bay

Key Numbers

  • $16 million – Cost of setting up the migrant camp at Guantanamo Bay
  • 195 tents – Number of tents erected, capable of housing 500 migrants
  • 40 detainees – Number of migrants, including 23 “high-threat illegal aliens,” relocated to Louisiana
  • $3.1 million – Cost per tent, which did not meet ICE’s standards

+ Full Analysis

Full Depth

Complete Coverage

The Catalyst

The decision to use Guantanamo Bay as a migrant detention center was part of President Trump’s broader efforts to address immigration and border security. However, the operation faced immediate criticism for its costs and the conditions of the facilities.

“It was clear that this was entirely for optics and the fact that President Trump wanted to be able to say that he was sending immigrants to Guantanamo Bay,” said Rep. Sara Jacobs, highlighting the lack of operational value.

Inside Forces

The migrant camp at Guantanamo Bay was set up in late January, with the first detainees arriving in February. Despite the initial plans, the number of migrants sent to the base remained low, and the facilities were deemed inadequate by ICE standards.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had defended the use of Guantanamo Bay, but the practical challenges and high costs led to the relocation of all migrants to Louisiana.

Power Dynamics

The Trump administration’s decision reflects a broader strategy to use Guantanamo Bay for immigration purposes, despite historical associations with human rights abuses. The move was part of a series of executive orders aimed at tightening border security and deportation policies.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem emphasized that many of the migrants were members of the Venezuelan street gang Tren de Aragua, accused of serious crimes.

Outside Impact

The operation has sparked significant controversy, with immigration rights groups filing lawsuits against the U.S. government. These lawsuits allege violations of U.S. law and criticize the conditions at the detention center.

DHS has dismissed these allegations, accusing groups like the American Civil Liberties Union of promoting “open borders” and disrupting public safety missions.

Future Forces

The future use of Guantanamo Bay for migrant detention remains uncertain. The relocation of migrants to Louisiana and the cessation of further flights to the base suggest a reevaluation of the strategy.

Key areas to watch include potential changes in deportation policies, the role of Guantanamo Bay in future operations, and the ongoing legal challenges to the government’s actions.

Data Points

  • Late January 2025: President Trump announces plans to use Guantanamo Bay for migrant detention.
  • February 2025: First migrants arrive at Guantanamo Bay.
  • March 2025: All migrants relocated to Louisiana due to inadequate facilities.
  • $16 million: Total cost of the operation at Guantanamo Bay.

The Guantanamo Bay migrant operation highlights the complexities and controversies surrounding U.S. immigration policies. As the country navigates these issues, the focus will likely shift to more effective and cost-efficient solutions for managing migration.