Republicans Target PBS and NPR in Hearing Over Bias

Mar. 25, 2025, 8:06 pm ET

Instant Insight

30-Second Take

  • Republican lawmakers are targeting PBS and NPR in a contentious Congressional hearing.
  • The hearing, led by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, focuses on alleged liberal bias in public media.
  • Federal funding for public broadcasting is at risk amid these allegations.

+ Dive Deeper

Quick Brief

2-Minute Digest

Essential Context

The leaders of PBS and NPR are set to testify before the House DOGE subcommittee, chaired by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, in a hearing titled “Anti-American Airwaves: Holding the heads of NPR and PBS Accountable.” This hearing is part of a broader effort by Republican lawmakers to scrutinize public media for alleged liberal bias.

Core Players

  • Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene – Chair of the DOGE subcommittee
  • Paula Kerger – CEO of PBS
  • Katherine Maher – CEO of NPR
  • Elon Musk – Associated with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)

Key Numbers

  • $535 million – Annual federal appropriation for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting
  • 46% – Percentage of PBS viewers who identify as conservative (2016 data)
  • 21% – Percentage of Americans who favor ending federal support for public broadcasting (2017 survey)
  • March 26, 2025 – Date of the Congressional hearing

+ Full Analysis

Full Depth

Complete Coverage

The Catalyst

The hearing is a culmination of long-standing Republican efforts to reduce or eliminate federal funding for public broadcasting. President Trump, during his first term, repeatedly attempted to cut funding but was met with bipartisan resistance.

“I want to hear why NPR and PBS think they should ever again receive a single cent from the American taxpayer,” Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene stated, highlighting the contentious nature of the hearing.

Inside Forces

The DOGE subcommittee, named after Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, has been instrumental in pushing for government spending cuts, including those targeting programs deemed incompatible with the current administration’s agenda.

PBS and NPR have historically enjoyed bipartisan support, but recent criticisms from Republican lawmakers and conservative officials have put their federal funding at risk.

Power Dynamics

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s leadership of the DOGE subcommittee and her vocal criticism of public media underscore the significant influence of conservative lawmakers in this debate.

President Trump’s administration’s alignment with Project 2025, a right-wing blueprint that includes ending federal support for public broadcasting, further solidifies the political will to challenge public media funding.

Outside Impact

The potential cut in federal funding could have broad implications for public media, affecting not only NPR and PBS but also their local stations and the communities they serve.

A nationwide survey in 2022 named PBS the most trusted media organization, highlighting the public’s support for these institutions despite political tensions.

Future Forces

The outcome of this hearing could set a precedent for future funding decisions. If federal support is reduced or eliminated, public media may need to rely more heavily on private donations and corporate sponsorships.

Public media leaders are less hopeful about maintaining federal funding this time around, given the strong support from President Trump’s base and Republican lawmakers for cutting government spending.

Data Points

  • Late 1960s: Republican administrations begin efforts to end federal support for public media
  • 2022: PBS named the most trusted media organization in a nationwide survey
  • March 26, 2025: Scheduled date for the Congressional hearing
  • $535 million: Annual federal appropriation for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting

The ongoing debate over public media funding reflects deeper political and ideological divisions. As the hearing approaches, the future of public broadcasting hangs in the balance, with significant implications for the media landscape and the public’s access to information.