Bipartisan Lawmakers Push Bill for Remote Congressional Voting

Mar. 27, 2025, 5:45 pm ET

Instant Insight

30-Second Take

  • A bipartisan group of lawmakers is pushing for a bill to allow new parents in Congress to vote remotely for up to 12 weeks.
  • House Speaker Mike Johnson and other GOP leaders oppose the measure, citing constitutional concerns.
  • The proposal has garnered enough signatures to force a House vote despite leadership opposition.

+ Dive Deeper

Quick Brief

2-Minute Digest

Essential Context

Lawmakers from both parties, led by Representatives Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) and Brittany Pettersen (D-CO), are advocating for a change in House rules to allow new parents to vote by proxy. This move aims to address the challenges faced by lawmakers who must balance their legislative duties with parental responsibilities.

Core Players

  • Anna Paulina Luna – Republican Representative from Florida, co-sponsor of the bill
  • Brittany Pettersen – Democratic Representative from Colorado, co-sponsor of the bill
  • Mike Johnson – House Speaker, opposes the bill on constitutional grounds
  • House GOP Leadership – Opposes the bill, citing concerns about precedent and constitutional validity

Key Numbers

  • 12 weeks – Proposed duration for remote voting by new parents
  • 218 signatures – Required and achieved for the discharge petition to force a House vote
  • 206 Democrats and 12 Republicans – Signed the discharge petition
  • 7 legislative days – Waiting period before the measure can come to the House floor for a vote

+ Full Analysis

Full Depth

Complete Coverage

The Catalyst

The push for this change was triggered by the personal experiences of lawmakers like Luna and Pettersen, who faced significant challenges in balancing their legislative duties with the needs of their newborns. Luna missed critical votes due to her pregnancy and subsequent parental leave, while Pettersen rushed back to Washington with her newborn to vote on important legislation.

Inside Forces

The internal dynamics within the GOP are complex, with some members supporting the measure despite leadership opposition. Eleven House Republicans have signed the discharge petition, indicating a split within the party. House Speaker Mike Johnson and other leaders argue that proxy voting is unconstitutional and could set a dangerous precedent.

“Proxy voting raises serious constitutional questions. It also changes more than two and a half centuries of tradition, abuses the system, and creates the risk of a slippery slope toward more and more members casting votes remotely,” Johnson stated.

Power Dynamics

The power dynamics are skewed against the bill, with House GOP leadership firmly opposed. However, the bipartisan support and the successful discharge petition indicate that there is significant momentum behind the measure. Luna has vowed to make other legislating more difficult if the leadership tries to block it, leveraging the narrow GOP majority to her advantage.

Outside Impact

The broader implications of this bill extend beyond the immediate needs of new parents in Congress. It could set a precedent for other forms of remote voting and challenge traditional notions of legislative participation. Critics argue that it could lead to abuses and undermine the integrity of the legislative process.

Future Forces

The next steps involve bringing the measure to the House floor for a vote. Given the bipartisan support and the discharge petition, it is likely that the bill will be voted on in the near future. The outcome will depend on how effectively the proponents can address the constitutional concerns raised by the opposition.

Luna has indicated that this proposal is just a starting point and could be expanded to include parents who adopt or have children through surrogacy, further broadening its impact.

Data Points

  • March 11, 2025 – Date when the discharge petition achieved the required 218 signatures
  • January 2025 – When the bill was introduced by Rep. Brittany Pettersen
  • 2023 – Year when Luna gave birth and faced complications that prevented her from attending votes
  • 12th and 13th – Luna and Pettersen are the 12th and 13th women in congressional history to give birth while in office, respectively

The debate over remote voting for new parents in Congress highlights broader issues about work-life balance, legislative participation, and constitutional interpretation. The outcome of this bill will have significant implications for the future of how lawmakers engage with their duties and their personal lives.