RFK Jr. Replaces All CDC Vaccine Advisors

Jun. 25, 2025, 10:23 am ET

Instant Insight

30-Second Take

  • The CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) is meeting on June 25-26, 2025, after a significant overhaul.
  • Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. removed all 17 previous members and appointed eight new ones.
  • The new committee will discuss and vote on recommendations for maternal/pediatric respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccines.

+ Dive Deeper

Quick Brief

2-Minute Digest

Essential Context

The ACIP, a crucial advisory body for the CDC, has undergone a drastic change. On June 9, 2025, Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. dismissed all 17 sitting members and replaced them with eight new members. This move aims to restore public trust in vaccine science, though it has raised concerns about the committee’s future effectiveness.

Core Players

  • Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. – Secretary of Health and Human Services
  • CDC – Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • ACIP – Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices
  • New ACIP Members – Eight newly appointed experts, some of whom have been critics of certain vaccines

Key Numbers

  • 17 – Number of former ACIP members dismissed
  • 8 – Number of new ACIP members appointed
  • June 9, 2025 – Date of the announcement to replace ACIP members
  • June 25-26, 2025 – Dates of the ACIP meeting

+ Full Analysis

Full Depth

Complete Coverage

The Catalyst

The decision to replace the entire ACIP membership was announced by Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. on June 9, 2025. This move was part of an effort to reestablish public confidence in vaccine science, following concerns about conflicts of interest and transparency within the committee.

“The changes are intended to ensure the public’s trust in the vaccine advisory process,” Kennedy stated, though the move has been met with skepticism by many in the medical community.

Inside Forces

The new ACIP members include some who have been critical of vaccines, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. This shift in membership has raised questions about the committee’s ability to provide unbiased and scientifically sound advice.

Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, expressed concerns about the underutilization of effective vaccines like those for RSV, highlighting the need for credible advisory bodies.

Power Dynamics

The replacement of ACIP members gives significant influence to Secretary Kennedy and the new appointees. However, this move has also sparked criticism from health experts and organizations that question the qualifications and biases of the new members.

The change reflects a broader power dynamic where political and public health interests intersect, potentially impacting the credibility and effectiveness of vaccine recommendations.

Outside Impact

The broader implications of this change are significant. Public trust in vaccine science could be further eroded if the new committee’s recommendations are perceived as politically motivated rather than scientifically driven.

Healthcare providers and patients may face confusion and skepticism regarding vaccine recommendations, potentially affecting vaccination rates and public health outcomes.

Future Forces

The upcoming ACIP meeting will focus on discussing and voting on recommendations for RSV vaccines. The outcomes of these discussions will be closely watched for signs of how the new committee will operate.

Key areas to watch include:

  • Recommendations for maternal/pediatric RSV vaccines
  • Votes on RSV vaccines under the federal Vaccines for Children program
  • Future policy directions on vaccine approvals and recommendations

Data Points

  • June 9, 2025 – Date of the announcement to replace ACIP members
  • June 25-26, 2025 – Dates of the ACIP meeting
  • 32-36 weeks – Recommended gestational age for RSV vaccination in pregnant individuals
  • 19 months – Age threshold for monoclonal antibody shots for RSV in children

The changes to the ACIP and the upcoming meeting highlight a critical juncture in public health policy. The outcomes will have far-reaching implications for vaccine science, public trust, and health outcomes in the U.S.