Justice Department Fires Prosecutors in Jan. 6 Cases

Jun. 28, 2025, 12:59 pm ET

Instant Insight

30-Second Take

  • The Justice Department has fired three prosecutors involved in Jan. 6 Capitol riot cases.
  • The firings include two supervisory attorneys and one line attorney from the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington.
  • The move is part of a broader pattern of dismissals targeting attorneys connected to cases against Trump supporters and President Trump.

+ Dive Deeper

Quick Brief

2-Minute Digest

Essential Context

On Friday, the Justice Department fired at least three prosecutors who were working on cases related to the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack. This action is the latest in a series of moves by the Trump administration targeting attorneys involved in prosecutions of Trump supporters and President Trump himself.

Core Players

  • Donald Trump – Current president, involved in the firings through his administration.
  • Pam Bondi – Attorney General, signed the termination letters.
  • U.S. Attorney’s Office in Washington – The office where the fired prosecutors were based.

Key Numbers

  • 3 – Number of prosecutors fired.
  • 2 – Number of supervisory attorneys among those fired.
  • 1 – Number of line attorney fired.
  • January 6, 2021 – Date of the Capitol attack.

+ Full Analysis

Full Depth

Complete Coverage

The Catalyst

The firings were confirmed by sources familiar with the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. The termination letters, signed by Attorney General Pam Bondi, did not provide specific reasons for the removals, citing only “Article II of the United States Constitution and the laws of the United States.”

This move follows previous actions by the Trump administration, including the demotion of key figures from the Capitol Siege Section in February and the termination of about two dozen prosecutors hired under the Biden administration in January.

Inside Forces

The Justice Department has been undergoing significant changes since President Trump’s return to office. The firings are seen as part of an effort to purge the agency of lawyers perceived as insufficiently loyal to the administration.

Previous actions include the demotion of several key figures from the department’s Capitol Siege Section and the termination of prosecutors who helped secure convictions against extremist leaders.

Power Dynamics

The Trump administration’s actions have raised concerns about the erosion of the Justice Department’s independence from the White House. The firings and demotions suggest a tightening grip on the department, potentially undermining civil service protections for career lawyers.

Attorney General Pam Bondi’s role in signing the termination letters highlights her influence in these personnel decisions.

Outside Impact

The broader implications of these firings include potential disruptions to ongoing prosecutions related to the Jan. 6 attack. Critics argue that these moves could compromise the integrity of the justice system and undermine public trust.

Legal and civil rights groups have expressed alarm over the disregard for civil service protections and the potential politicization of the Justice Department.

Future Forces

Looking ahead, these actions may set a precedent for future personnel decisions within the Justice Department. The administration’s approach could lead to further purges and reorganizations, potentially affecting a wide range of cases and investigations.

As the political landscape continues to evolve, the independence and integrity of the Justice Department will remain under scrutiny.

Data Points

  • January 6, 2021 – Date of the Capitol attack.
  • February 2025 – Month when key figures from the Capitol Siege Section were demoted.
  • January 2025 – Month when about two dozen prosecutors hired under the Biden administration were terminated.
  • Article II – Constitutional basis cited in the termination letters.

The recent firings of prosecutors involved in Jan. 6 cases highlight a significant shift in the Justice Department’s operations under the Trump administration. As these changes continue, they are likely to have far-reaching implications for the justice system and the rule of law in the United States.