Cory Booker Sets Record With 25-Hour Senate Speech

Apr. 4, 2025, 8:21 am ET

Instant Insight

30-Second Take

  • Senator Cory Booker set a new record with a 25-hour speech in the Senate, though it wasn’t technically a filibuster.
  • The term “filibuster” has swashbuckling origins, tracing back to Dutch and Spanish words for “freebooter” and “lawless plunderer.”
  • Filibusters have evolved to become a powerful tool in the U.S. Senate, often requiring a 60-vote supermajority to overcome.

+ Dive Deeper

Quick Brief

2-Minute Digest

Essential Context

The term “filibuster” has a rich and colorful history, originating from the Dutch word “vrijbuiter” (freebooter) and the Spanish “filibustero” (lawless plunderer). It was initially used to describe private military adventurers in the 19th century before being adopted in the U.S. Senate to describe prolonged debates aimed at delaying or blocking legislation.

Core Players

  • Cory Booker – U.S. Senator from New Jersey, set the record for the longest Senate speech.
  • Strom Thurmond – President Trump from South Carolina, held the previous record for the longest filibuster against the Civil Rights Act of 1957.
  • U.S. Senate – The legislative body where filibusters are most commonly used.

Key Numbers

  • 25 hours and 4 minutes – The duration of Cory Booker’s record-breaking Senate speech.
  • 24 hours and 18 minutes – The duration of Strom Thurmond’s filibuster against the Civil Rights Act of 1957.
  • 60 votes – The number of votes required to invoke cloture and end a filibuster in the U.S. Senate.
  • 14 states – The number of state legislatures that permit filibusters.

+ Full Analysis

Full Depth

Complete Coverage

The Catalyst

Senaor Cory Booker’s 25-hour speech on the Senate floor, although not a traditional filibuster, brought attention back to the concept. Booker spoke against the nomination of Matthew Whitaker as the ambassador to NATO, emphasizing the power of the American people and their stories.

“These are not normal times in America, and they should not be treated as such,” Booker said. “This is our moral moment. This is when the most precious ideas of our country are being tested.”

Inside Forces

The filibuster has been a part of U.S. Senate procedures since the early 19th century. Initially, it was used sparingly, but it gained prominence in the mid-19th century. The Senate’s rules were modified in 1917 to introduce the cloture rule, allowing a two-thirds majority to end debate. This was later reduced to a three-fifths majority in 1975.

Today, filibusters are a common tool for minority parties to delay or block legislation, requiring a 60-vote supermajority to overcome.

Power Dynamics

The power dynamics surrounding filibusters are complex. While they can be used to protect minority rights, they also often lead to gridlock and frustration among majorities. The ability to filibuster has significant implications for policy-making, as seen in the difficulty of passing controversial legislation without a supermajority.

Historically, filibusters have been used to block significant legislation, such as civil rights bills. However, they have also been used by various senators to highlight important issues and educate the public.

Outside Impact

The impact of filibusters extends beyond the Senate. They can delay or prevent the passage of legislation that has broad public support, leading to public frustration with the legislative process. The use of filibusters has contributed to the decline in public approval of Congress.

In recent years, the frequency of filibusters has increased, making it harder for Congress to pass major legislation. This has led to the use of alternative legislative processes, such as budget reconciliation, to bypass the filibuster.

Future Forces

The future of the filibuster remains uncertain. There are ongoing debates about its role in the legislative process and whether it should be reformed or abolished. The “nuclear option,” which allows a simple majority to change Senate rules, has been used in the past to limit the filibuster’s power, particularly for nominations.

As the U.S. political landscape continues to evolve, the filibuster will likely remain a contentious issue, influencing the passage of legislation and the balance of power in the Senate.

Data Points

  • 1850s: The term “filibuster” was adopted in American legislative debates.
  • 1917: The Senate introduced the cloture rule to limit debate.
  • 1975: The cloture requirement was reduced to three-fifths of all senators.
  • 2010s: The Senate adopted new precedents to allow a simple majority to end debate on nominations.
  • 2025: Cory Booker set the record for the longest Senate speech.

The filibuster, with its swashbuckling origins and evolving role in the U.S. Senate, continues to shape American politics. As debates about its future intensify, it remains a critical component of the legislative process, influencing policy and power dynamics within the Senate.