Cruz Targets Woke Grants, Researchers Push Back

Feb. 13, 2025, 8:27 am ET

Instant Insight

30-Second Take

  • Sen. Ted Cruz has compiled a list of what he calls “woke” science projects funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), including studies on self-driving cars and solar eclipses.
  • Researchers argue that Cruz’s list misrepresents the scientific value of these studies and disparages important research.
  • This move is part of broader Republican efforts to cut federal research funding and diversity programs.

+ Dive Deeper

Quick Brief

2-Minute Digest

Essential Context

Sen. Ted Cruz, chair of the Senate committee on Commerce, Science & Transportation, has released a database highlighting over 3,400 NSF grants that he claims promote “woke” Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) or neo-Marxist ideologies. This initiative is part of ongoing Republican efforts to justify cuts to federal research funding and diversity programs.

Core Players

  • Sen. Ted Cruz – U.S. Senator from Texas, chair of the Senate committee on Commerce, Science & Transportation
  • National Science Foundation (NSF) – Federal agency responsible for promoting scientific research
  • Research Institutions – Universities and institutions receiving NSF grants, such as the University of Massachusetts Amherst and the University of Michigan

Key Numbers

  • 3,400+ – Number of NSF grants flagged by Cruz’s team as promoting “woke” DEI or neo-Marxist ideologies
  • $226,000 – Amount of the NSF grant to study linguistic differences between Hebrew and English
  • 7 – Number of Israel-linked grants mentioned in Cruz’s database
  • 2022 – Year the controversial NSF grant to the University of Massachusetts Amherst was awarded

+ Full Analysis

Full Depth

Complete Coverage

The Catalyst

Sen. Ted Cruz’s database includes grants that he believes are misaligned with the true purposes of scientific research. For example, a $226,000 grant to study the linguistic differences between Hebrew and English was flagged due to its mention of gender in the context of noun assignment in the Hebrew language.

This move has sparked controversy among researchers who argue that such grants are essential for advancing scientific knowledge and understanding.

Inside Forces

Cruz’s initiative is driven by his and other Republicans’ desire to cut federal funding for research projects they perceive as promoting “woke” ideologies. This effort is part of a broader strategy to reduce the influence of DEI and social justice agendas in scientific research.

The NSF has faced criticism for allegedly politicizing its funding decisions, with Cruz arguing that the agency has been “weaponized” to push far-left ideologies.

Power Dynamics

As the chair of the Senate committee on Commerce, Science & Transportation, Sen. Ted Cruz holds significant influence over the direction of federal research funding. His database has the potential to sway public opinion and congressional decisions on research funding.

Researchers and academic institutions, however, are pushing back against what they see as a misrepresentation of their work and an attempt to undermine the integrity of scientific research.

Outside Impact

The broader implications of Cruz’s actions include potential cuts to vital research projects and a shift in the focus of scientific funding. This could affect not only the research community but also the broader public, as reduced funding for scientific studies could impact innovations in fields like healthcare, technology, and environmental science.

Additionally, the move has drawn attention to the ongoing debate about the role of politics in scientific research and the balance between academic freedom and public funding accountability.

Future Forces

Looking ahead, the debate is likely to continue with significant implications for the future of scientific research in the U.S. Researchers and institutions may need to adapt to changing funding priorities and potential new guidelines for grant applications.

The outcome will depend on how policymakers navigate the complex interplay between scientific advancement, public funding, and ideological agendas.

Data Points

  • Feb. 13, 2025: Cruz releases the database of “woke” NSF grants.
  • 2022: The NSF awards the $226,000 grant to the University of Massachusetts Amherst.
  • Over 3,400 grants flagged by Cruz’s team.
  • Seven grants related to Israeli research partnerships highlighted.

The controversy surrounding Sen. Ted Cruz’s list of “woke” science projects underscores a deeper struggle over the direction and funding of scientific research in the United States. As this debate continues, it will be crucial to balance the need for accountability in public funding with the importance of preserving academic freedom and advancing scientific knowledge.