DOGE Cuts Federal Surveys, Threatening U.S. Data Integrity

Jun. 4, 2025, 8:21 am ET

Instant Insight

30-Second Take

  • DOGE’s push to cut federal data collection threatens the reliability of U.S. statistics.
  • Key surveys, including those by the Census Bureau, are being terminated without public input.
  • Experts warn this could undermine critical data on the economy, public health, and society.

+ Dive Deeper

Quick Brief

2-Minute Digest

Essential Context

The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), launched by Elon Musk, is targeting federal data collection efforts, particularly those of the U.S. Census Bureau. This initiative aims to cut what DOGE deems as “wasteful” surveys, but it has raised significant concerns among data users and experts.

Core Players

  • Elon Musk – Founder of DOGE and CEO of SpaceX and Tesla
  • U.S. Census Bureau – Primary agency for collecting national statistics
  • Data Foundation – Non-profit advocating for transparent and reliable data collection
  • Population Reference Bureau – Nonpartisan research organization analyzing demographic data

Key Numbers

  • $16.5 million – Cost of the five surveys terminated by DOGE
  • 300,000-400,000 – Estimated reduction in federal workforce due to DOGE cuts
  • 5 – Number of surveys terminated by DOGE

+ Full Analysis

Full Depth

Complete Coverage

The Catalyst

DOGE’s initiative to cut federal spending, particularly in data collection, has been met with alarm from various stakeholders. The termination of surveys without public input or consultation with key stakeholders is seen as a significant threat to the integrity of national statistics.

“These data belong to the public,” said Beth Jarosz, a senior program director at the Population Reference Bureau. “The taxpayers paid for the data and they should get the data unless they don’t want it to be collected anymore.”

Inside Forces

The decision to terminate surveys has been criticized for lacking transparency and public engagement. The Data Foundation has called for the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and congressional oversight committees to ensure that any changes to data collections are publicly disclosed and involve discussions with key stakeholders.

This lack of transparency and public process may violate existing laws, such as the Paperwork Reduction Act.

Power Dynamics

DOGE’s actions are influenced by its mission to reduce federal spending, but this mission is at odds with the need for reliable and comprehensive data. The Census Bureau and other statistical agencies rely on these surveys to provide critical information for government decision-making and public policy.

The independence of statistical agencies is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the data they collect.

Outside Impact

The broader implications of DOGE’s actions are far-reaching. The reliability of future U.S. statistics, including census results and economic indicators, is at risk. This could affect policy decisions, business strategies, and public health initiatives that depend on accurate data.

Experts warn that undermining the statistical infrastructure could have long-term consequences for effective governance and public trust in government data.

Future Forces

Looking ahead, there is a need for a balanced approach that considers both the efficiency of government spending and the importance of reliable data collection. Stakeholders are calling for transparent mechanisms and public engagement in any decisions to alter data collections.

Potential reforms could include more transparent review processes and greater involvement of key stakeholders to ensure that data collections serve the public interest without compromising their integrity.

Data Points

  • May 21, 2025: Data Foundation issues a statement highlighting concerns over DOGE’s impact on federal statistics.
  • May 23, 2025: DOGE announces the termination of five surveys conducted by the Census Bureau.
  • 2025: Estimated federal workforce reduction due to DOGE cuts.

The ongoing debate over DOGE’s data collection cuts underscores the delicate balance between fiscal efficiency and the need for reliable national statistics. As the situation evolves, it is crucial for stakeholders to ensure that any changes to data collections are transparent, publicly disclosed, and aligned with the principles of effective governance.