Family Separation Policy Revival Fears Under Trump Loom

Jan. 27, 2025, 5:30 pm ET

Instant Insight

30-Second Take

  • Trump’s family separation policy, implemented from 2017 to 2018, remains a contentious issue.
  • The policy separated over 5,500 children from their parents, causing lasting trauma.
  • There is ongoing concern about the potential revival of this policy if Trump returns to office.

+ Dive Deeper

Quick Brief

2-Minute Digest

Essential Context

The Trump administration’s family separation policy, known as “Zero Tolerance,” was a harsh immigration enforcement strategy aimed at deterring unauthorized crossings by separating migrant children from their parents. This policy was in effect from 2017 to 2018 and had severe human consequences.

Core Players

  • Donald Trump – Former president and 2024 Republican frontrunner
  • Department of Homeland Security (DHS) – Implemented the “Zero Tolerance” policy
  • US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) – Managed the care of separated children
  • American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) – Advocated for the rights of separated families

Key Numbers

  • 5,569 – Total number of children separated from their parents under the policy
  • 1,000+ – Children still separated from their parents as of November 2023
  • 68 – Parents that the government cannot contact to reunify with their children
  • June 20, 2018 – Date of the executive order to end family separations

+ Full Analysis

Full Depth

Complete Coverage

The Catalyst

The “Zero Tolerance” policy was formally announced in April 2018 but began in practice as early as the summer of 2017. It was designed to prosecute all adults caught crossing the border, which led to the separation of children from their parents.

This policy sparked intense public and political outcry, leading to its eventual halt through an executive order signed by Trump on June 20, 2018.

Inside Forces

The policy’s implementation was marred by operational challenges. Border Patrol stations were overwhelmed, and children were kept in overcrowded and unsanitary conditions. The government failed to maintain a central database to track separated families, complicating reunification efforts.

Internal documents revealed that the Trump administration lacked the ability to track children and parents separated at the border, exacerbating the crisis.

Power Dynamics

The policy was a result of the Trump administration’s hardline stance on immigration. Despite the executive order to end family separations, the practice continued in various forms until at least the end of 2019.

Trump has not ruled out reviving the policy if he returns to office, a stance that has sparked renewed concern among advocacy groups and medical professionals.

Outside Impact

The family separation policy had devastating effects on the mental and physical health of the children and parents. Many families reported trauma, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and challenges with daily functioning.

The policy also drew international criticism, highlighting the humanitarian and ethical implications of such measures.

Future Forces

As Trump considers another presidential term, the possibility of reinstating the family separation policy looms. This has prompted renewed calls for legislative action to prevent such policies in the future.

Advocacy groups and the Biden administration have worked to reunify families and provide support services, including immigration legal services and behavioral health counseling.

Data Points

  • April 2018: Formal announcement of the “Zero Tolerance” policy
  • June 20, 2018: Executive order signed to end family separations
  • June 25, 2018: Customs and Border Protection ceased referring all border-crossers for prosecution
  • October 2019: Revised estimate of separated children increased to nearly 5,500
  • January 20, 2025: Trump administration revoked a Biden executive order aimed at reunifying separated families

The legacy of the family separation policy continues to impact many lives. As the U.S. navigates its immigration policies, it is crucial to consider the long-term effects of such measures on families and the broader societal implications.