Federal Judge Blocks Trump’s Move Against Harvard Visa Programs

May. 29, 2025, 9:39 pm ET

Instant Insight

30-Second Take

  • A federal judge has extended a temporary restraining order, blocking the Trump administration from revoking Harvard University’s certification to sponsor international student visas.
  • The order allows Harvard to continue enrolling international students as the lawsuit proceeds.
  • The Trump administration had accused Harvard of fostering violence, antisemitism, and ties to the Chinese Communist Party.

+ Dive Deeper

Quick Brief

2-Minute Digest

Essential Context

U.S. District Judge Allison D. Burroughs, an Obama appointee, extended her earlier restraining order, preserving the status quo while both sides confer and submit proposed orders. This decision prevents the Trump administration from revoking Harvard’s certification under the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP), which is crucial for the university to sponsor international students for U.S. visas.

Core Players

  • U.S. District Judge Allison D. Burroughs – Extended the temporary restraining order.
  • Donald Trump – President Trump, whose administration is seeking to revoke Harvard’s SEVP certification.
  • Harvard University – The Ivy League school at the center of the dispute.
  • Department of Homeland Security (DHS) – The agency responsible for the SEVP program.

Key Numbers

  • April 16, 2025: DHS threatened Harvard with decertification if it failed to respond to data requests regarding student protest activity.
  • April 30, 2025: Deadline for Harvard to comply with DHS’s data requests.
  • May 29, 2025: Judge Burroughs extended the temporary restraining order.

+ Full Analysis

Full Depth

Complete Coverage

The Catalyst

The Trump administration’s move to revoke Harvard’s SEVP certification was triggered by accusations that the university was fostering violence, antisemitism, and coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party on its campus. DHS Secretary Kristi Noem demanded detailed records on Harvard’s foreign student visa holders’ activities, threatening decertification if the university did not comply.

Inside Forces

The dispute highlights the broad discretion of the DHS and ICE in certifying, extending, or revoking a university’s participation in the SEVP program. Legal experts note that foreign students have fewer protections than U.S. citizens, making Harvard vulnerable to the government’s actions as long as procedural requirements are met.

Power Dynamics

Judge Burroughs’ decision to extend the restraining order gives Harvard temporary relief but does not resolve the underlying issues. The Trump administration’s actions reflect a broader policy stance on immigration and national security, while Harvard’s position underscores the importance of maintaining its international student program.

Outside Impact

The ruling has broader implications for other universities and international students in the U.S. It could create a chilling effect, discouraging students from applying to or attending Harvard and potentially other institutions facing similar scrutiny. This could impact the diversity and global talent pool in U.S. higher education.

Future Forces

As the lawsuit proceeds, several key issues will be addressed:

  • The legitimacy of the Trump administration’s accusations against Harvard.
  • The procedural requirements for revoking a university’s SEVP certification.
  • The impact on international student enrollment and U.S. higher education policies.

Data Points

  • January 29, 2025: Executive Order 14188 was issued, focusing on additional measures to combat antisemitism, which may influence the context of the dispute.
  • May 15, 2025: The Department of State added new reporting requirements for J-1 Exchange Visitor Program sponsors, including incidents related to antisemitism and terrorism.
  • The SEVP program is administered by DHS and ICE, giving the Trump administration significant control over university certifications.

The ongoing legal battle between the Trump administration and Harvard University over international student visas highlights critical issues in immigration policy, national security, and the role of higher education in the U.S. The outcome will have far-reaching implications for universities, international students, and the broader educational landscape.