Federal Judge Reinstates NLRB Member Gwynne Wilcox After Trump Firing

Mar. 6, 2025, 11:55 pm ET

Instant Insight

30-Second Take

  • A federal judge has reversed President Donald Trump’s firing of National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) member Gwynne Wilcox.
  • The ruling declares Trump’s termination of Wilcox as “null and void” and orders her reinstatement.
  • The decision emphasizes that “an American president is not a king” and highlights the limits of presidential power.

+ Dive Deeper

Quick Brief

2-Minute Digest

Essential Context

On March 6, 2025, U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell issued a ruling that reinstates Gwynne Wilcox to her position on the National Labor Relations Board. Wilcox, appointed by President Joe Biden, was fired by President Trump in January via email, citing that heads of agencies must share the objectives of his administration.

Core Players

  • Gwynne Wilcox – NLRB member and first Black woman to serve on the board
  • President Donald Trump – President who fired Wilcox
  • Judge Beryl Howell – U.S. District Judge who reversed Trump’s decision
  • National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) – Agency responsible for enforcing U.S. labor laws

Key Numbers

  • 2028 – Year when Wilcox’s term is set to end
  • 90 years – Age of the NLRB, with Wilcox being the first member ever fired by a president
  • 2-1 – Potential Democratic majority on the NLRB with Wilcox’s reinstatement

+ Full Analysis

Full Depth

Complete Coverage

The Catalyst

President Trump’s decision to fire Wilcox in January sparked a legal challenge. Wilcox sued to be reinstated, arguing that her termination was unlawful because it did not follow the statutory requirement that NLRB members can only be removed for “neglect of duty or malfeasance in office.”

Judge Howell’s ruling on March 6, 2025, upheld this argument, stating that Trump’s actions were a “blatant violation of the law.”

Inside Forces

The firing of Wilcox and NLRB counsel Jennifer Abruzzo was part of Trump’s broader efforts to reshape the NLRB. Trump replaced Wilcox with Marvin Kaplan as the board’s chair, a move seen as part of a larger strategy to align the board with his administration’s objectives.

Wilcox’s reinstatement could restore a 2-1 Democratic majority on the board, potentially overturning some of the recent changes made by the Trump administration.

Power Dynamics

Judge Howell’s ruling is a significant check on Trump’s executive power, emphasizing that “an American president is not a king” and that his authority is not absolute. The decision reinforces the principle that federal officers and civil servants cannot be removed at will without just cause.

The ruling also prohibits Kaplan and other subordinates from treating Wilcox as if she has been removed or hindering her ability to perform her duties.

Outside Impact

The reinstatement of Wilcox has broader implications for labor relations and the balance of power within the NLRB. It could lead to a shift in the board’s decisions, potentially favoring more labor-friendly policies.

The ruling may also set a precedent for other federal agencies, reinforcing the limits of presidential authority in removing appointees without proper cause.

Future Forces

The Trump administration is likely to appeal this decision, which could lead to further legal battles potentially reaching the Supreme Court. This could prolong the uncertainty surrounding the NLRB’s composition and its ability to function with a full quorum.

The outcome of this case will be closely watched by labor unions, employers, and legal scholars, as it will help define the boundaries of presidential power in relation to independent federal agencies.

Data Points

  • January 2025 – President Trump fires Gwynne Wilcox and Jennifer Abruzzo via email.
  • March 6, 2025 – Judge Beryl Howell rules in favor of Wilcox’s reinstatement.
  • 2028 – Scheduled end of Wilcox’s term on the NLRB.
  • 90 years – Age of the NLRB, with this being the first instance of a president firing a board member.

The reinstatement of Gwynne Wilcox to the NLRB underscores the importance of judicial oversight in ensuring that executive actions align with the law. As the legal battle may continue, this decision serves as a significant reminder of the checks and balances inherent in the U.S. system of government.