Former DOGE Team Member Resigns Over Racist Posts

Feb. 7, 2025, 2:03 am ET

Instant Insight

30-Second Take

  • Marko Elez, a key member of Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), resigned after racist posts linked to him were exposed.
  • Elez had been granted access to the U.S. Treasury’s payments database just before his resignation.
  • The incident raises concerns about the vetting process for DOGE team members and their influence on government policies.

+ Dive Deeper

Quick Brief

2-Minute Digest

Essential Context

Marko Elez, a 25-year-old staff member of Elon Musk’s DOGE team, resigned after the Wall Street Journal uncovered racist posts on his social media account. These posts included advocacy for eugenics and the destruction of Israel and Gaza.

Core Players

  • Marko Elez – Former DOGE team member and employee at SpaceX and Starlink.
  • Elon Musk – Founder of SpaceX, Starlink, and head of DOGE team.
  • Donald Trump – U.S. President who tasked Musk with reducing federal government spending.
  • Scott Bessent – U.S. Treasury Secretary who personally vetted some DOGE team members.

Key Numbers

  • 25 – Age of Marko Elez.
  • December 2024 – Month when Elez’s social media account was deleted.
  • February 6, 2025 – Date when the racist posts were exposed and Elez resigned.

+ Full Analysis

Full Depth

Complete Coverage

The Catalyst

The resignation of Marko Elez was triggered by the exposure of his racist and inflammatory posts on a social media account linked to him. The account, which had been renamed from @marko_elez to @nullllptr, was uncovered by the Wall Street Journal.

“Just for the record, I was racist before it was cool,” one of the posts read. Another post expressed a desire for the destruction of Israel and Gaza.

Inside Forces

Elez was a key member of the DOGE team, tasked with identifying and eliminating unnecessary government programs and reducing the federal workforce. His role included administrator-level privileges, allowing him significant influence over government policies.

Despite his critical role, Elez’s social media activity revealed beliefs contradictory to the principles of diversity, equity, and inclusion, which DOGE was also working to dismantle within the federal government.

Power Dynamics

The incident highlights the power and influence held by DOGE team members, particularly those with access to sensitive government data. Elez’s ability to access the U.S. Treasury’s payments database, granted just before his resignation, raises questions about the vetting process for such positions.

Scott Bessent, the U.S. Treasury Secretary, had personally vetted some of the DOGE team members, though it is unclear if he vetted Elez specifically.

Outside Impact

The resignation and the associated scandal could embarrassment for the Trump administration, especially given the sensitive nature of Elez’s role. It also raises broader concerns about the vetting and oversight of individuals given access to critical government systems.

The incident may impact public trust in the DOGE team’s ability to impartially and effectively reduce government spending without undermining key programs.

Future Forces

In the aftermath, there will likely be increased scrutiny on the vetting processes for government personnel, especially those with access to sensitive information. The incident could lead to stricter background checks and more rigorous oversight.

Additionally, the controversy might influence how the DOGE team operates, potentially leading to changes in their approach to slashing government spending and programs.

Data Points

  • February 6, 2025 – Date of the Wall Street Journal’s report exposing Elez’s racist posts.
  • December 2024 – Month when the social media account @nullllptr was deleted.
  • Administrator-level privileges – The level of access Elez had within the DOGE team.
  • U.S. Treasury’s payments database – The sensitive system to which Elez was granted access.

The resignation of Marko Elez and the subsequent fallout underscore the importance of thorough vetting and oversight in government positions, especially those involving sensitive data and policy influence. As the DOGE team continues its mission to reduce government spending, it will likely face increased scrutiny and calls for transparency.