Trump Would Have Faced Conviction for Election Interference, According to DoJ Findings

Jan. 14, 2025, 12:35 pm ET

Instant Insight

30-Second Take

  • A Justice Department report reveals Donald Trump would have been convicted of election interference if he hadn’t won the 2024 presidential election.
  • The report details Trump’s efforts to retain power after losing the 2020 election, including attempts to manipulate vote counts and inspire violence on January 6, 2021.
  • Special Counsel Jack Smith defended his decision to prosecute Trump, citing sufficient evidence for a conviction.

+ Dive Deeper

Quick Brief

2-Minute Digest

Essential Context

A newly released Justice Department report, compiled by Special Counsel Jack Smith, outlines the evidence against Donald Trump for election interference. The report concludes that there was sufficient evidence to convict Trump, but the charges were dropped due to his election victory and imminent return to the presidency.

Core Players

  • Donald Trump – Former president, 2024 Republican frontrunner
  • Jack Smith – Special Counsel who oversaw the investigation
  • Merrick Garland – Attorney General who released the report for transparency
  • Mike Pence – Former Vice President involved in Trump’s efforts to retain power

Key Numbers

  • 137 pages – Length of the Special Counsel’s report
  • 2020 – Year of the presidential election Trump lost
  • 2024 – Year Trump won the presidential election, leading to charges being dropped
  • Jan. 6, 2021 – Date of the Capitol riot
  • 4 federal charges – Filed against Trump in August 2023, later superseded in August 2024

+ Full Analysis

Full Depth

Complete Coverage

The Catalyst

The Justice Department’s final report, released on January 14, 2025, marks the culmination of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into Trump’s actions following the 2020 election.

The report states, “Indeed, but for Mr. Trump’s election and imminent return to the Presidency, the Office assessed that the admissible evidence was sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction at trial.”

Inside Forces

Trump’s efforts to retain power included attempts to induce state officials to ignore vote counts and force his vice president, Mike Pence, and other justice department officials to act in contravention of their oaths. He also perpetuated false claims about election fraud despite being told by high-ranking officials that there was no evidence to support these claims.

Trump’s actions led to the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot, where his supporters committed acts of physical violence to obstruct the congressional certification of the presidential election.

Power Dynamics

The decision to drop the charges against Trump was influenced by longstanding Justice Department policy prohibiting the prosecution of a sitting president. Special Counsel Jack Smith defended his decision to bring the cases, saying, “To have done otherwise on the facts developed during our work would have been to shirk my duties as a prosecutor and a public servant.”

Trump responded to the report by calling Jack Smith a “lamebrain prosecutor” who failed to get his case tried before the election.

Outside Impact

The release of the report has significant implications for public trust in the electoral process and the rule of law. Attorney General Merrick Garland emphasized the public’s right to know the details of the investigation, contributing to transparency.

The report’s findings may also impact future political and legal proceedings, especially given Trump’s return to the presidency.

Future Forces

Looking ahead, the report sets a precedent for how future investigations into high-ranking officials might be handled. It also highlights the ongoing challenges in ensuring the integrity of the electoral process.

Potential future legal actions against Trump or his associates could be influenced by the evidence presented in this report, even if he is currently protected by his presidential status.

Data Points

  • Jan. 10, 2025: Jack Smith resigned from the Justice Department to avoid being fired by Trump after Inauguration Day.
  • Aug. 1, 2023: Trump was indicted on four federal charges related to election interference.
  • Aug. 27, 2024: A superseding indictment was issued, maintaining the four charges against Trump with some alterations.
  • Nov. 2024: Trump won the presidential election, leading to the charges being dropped.

The release of this report underscores the complex and often contentious nature of political investigations in the United States. As Trump begins his second term, the implications of these findings will continue to shape the political landscape and public discourse.