House Censures Al Green for Disrupting Trump’s Address

Mar. 6, 2025, 9:03 pm ET

Instant Insight

30-Second Take

  • Rep. Al Green was censured by the House for disrupting President Trump’s address to Congress.
  • Green shouted at President Trump during the speech, leading to his removal from the House chamber.
  • The censure vote passed 224-198, with 10 Democrats supporting the measure.

+ Dive Deeper

Quick Brief

2-Minute Digest

Essential Context

On Tuesday, March 5, 2025, Rep. Al Green, a Democrat from Texas, disrupted President Trump’s address to a joint session of Congress. Green’s outburst occurred when President Trump claimed to have a historic mandate from voters. This incident led to Green’s removal from the House chamber and subsequent censure by the House of Representatives.

Core Players

  • Rep. Al Green – Democrat from Texas, representing the 9th congressional district since 2005.
  • President Trump – Addressed Congress on March 5, 2025.
  • Speaker Mike Johnson – Ordered Green’s removal from the House chamber.

Key Numbers

  • 224-198: Vote tally in favor of censuring Rep. Al Green.
  • 10: Number of Democrats who voted for the censure.
  • 28: Rep. Al Green is the 28th lawmaker to be censured in the House of Representatives.

+ Full Analysis

Full Depth

Complete Coverage

The Catalyst

During President Trump’s address to Congress, Rep. Al Green stood up, raised his cane, and shouted at President Trump, prompting his removal from the chamber. This action was in response to President Trump’s claim of having a historic mandate from voters.

“I’m willing to suffer whatever punishment is available to me,” Green said later, emphasizing his stance against President Trump’s policies, particularly those affecting healthcare.

Inside Forces

The incident reflects ongoing tensions between Democrats and the Trump administration. Green has been a vocal critic of President Trump, having introduced articles of impeachment against him twice during his first term.

Democratic leaders had urged lawmakers to maintain decorum during the speech, but many Democrats chose to protest in various ways, including shouting, walking out, or other forms of dissent.

Power Dynamics

The censure vote highlights the power dynamics within the House of Representatives. With a vote of 224-198, the measure was supported by all Republicans and 10 Democrats. This split reflects the deep partisan divisions in Congress.

“We must maintain a standard in the House of Representatives,” said Rep. Dan Newhouse, who introduced the censure resolution. “Any member’s refusal to adhere to the speaker’s direction to cease such behavior must be reprimanded.”

Outside Impact

The censure has broader implications for congressional decorum and the conduct of its members. It follows a pattern of increasing contentiousness during presidential addresses, such as Rep. Joe Wilson’s reprimand in 2009 for shouting at President Obama.

The incident also underscores the ongoing struggle for control and influence within the House, particularly between Democrats and Republicans.

Future Forces

Looking forward, this incident may set a precedent for how future disruptions will be handled. Green’s actions and the subsequent censure could embolden or deter other lawmakers from similar protests.

Moreover, Green has announced plans to introduce articles of impeachment against President Trump again, indicating continued opposition and potential future conflicts.

Data Points

  • March 5, 2025: Date of President Trump’s address to Congress and Rep. Al Green’s disruption.
  • March 6, 2025: Date of the House vote to censure Rep. Al Green.
  • 2005: Year Rep. Al Green began representing Texas’ 9th congressional district.
  • 2017: Year Green first introduced articles of impeachment against President Trump.
  • 2024: Year President Trump claimed to have a historic mandate from voters, prompting Green’s outburst.

The censure of Rep. Al Green marks another chapter in the ongoing political tensions within the U.S. Congress. As the legislative body navigates these challenges, it will be crucial to observe how such incidents influence future interactions between lawmakers and the executive branch.