House Votes to Censure Al Green for Outburst During Trump Speech

Mar. 6, 2025, 1:53 pm ET

Instant Insight

30-Second Take

  • The House voted to censure Rep. Al Green for disrupting President Trump’s joint address to Congress.
  • 10 Democrats joined Republicans to support the censure, which passed 224-198.
  • Green’s outburst was over Trump’s claim of a “mandate” and his opposition to cuts in Medicaid.

+ Dive Deeper

Quick Brief

2-Minute Digest

Essential Context

On March 5, 2025, Rep. Al Green disrupted President Trump’s speech to a joint session of Congress, prompting a censure vote. Green shouted at Trump, objecting to his claim of a mandate and his proposed cuts to Medicaid.

Core Players

  • Rep. Al Green – Democratic Representative from Texas
  • President Trump – President of the United States
  • Speaker Mike Johnson – Speaker of the House of Representatives
  • Rep. Dan Newhouse – Republican Representative from Washington who introduced the censure resolution

Key Numbers

  • 224-198: The vote count in favor of censuring Rep. Al Green.
  • 10: Number of Democrats who voted with Republicans to censure Green.
  • 11: Number of terms Rep. Al Green has served in Congress.
  • 5: Number of members of Congress censured in this decade, including Green.

+ Full Analysis

Full Depth

Complete Coverage

The Catalyst

Rep. Al Green’s outburst occurred during President Trump’s speech to a joint session of Congress on March 4, 2025. Green stood up and shouted, “You have no mandate to cut Medicaid,” after Trump claimed his electoral victory as a mandate.

This incident was not isolated; Green has a history of vocal opposition and has previously introduced articles of impeachment against Trump.

Inside Forces

The House’s decision to censure Green reflects ongoing tensions between Democrats and Republicans. Democratic leaders had urged lawmakers to maintain decorum during Trump’s speech, but many chose to protest in various ways.

Green’s actions were defended by some Democrats, who saw them as a necessary stand against Trump’s policies. However, the censure vote also highlighted internal divisions within the Democratic Party, with 10 members voting in favor of the censure.[1][4]

Power Dynamics

The power dynamics in the House were clearly on display during the censure vote. Speaker Mike Johnson played a crucial role in maintaining order and called for Green’s removal from the chamber.

Rep. Dan Newhouse’s introduction of the censure resolution and its passage with bipartisan support underscore the institutional commitment to maintaining decorum in the House.[1][4]

Outside Impact

The censure of Rep. Al Green has broader implications for congressional conduct and the balance of power in the House. It marks a continuation of a trend where censures, once rare, are becoming more common as a tool for political discipline.

This incident also highlights the ongoing struggle between differing political ideologies and the challenges of maintaining civility in a highly polarized political environment.[1][4]

Future Forces

The aftermath of the censure vote may set a precedent for future disciplinary actions against members who disrupt congressional proceedings. It also signals that both parties are willing to use censure as a political tool to enforce behavioral standards.

For Rep. Green, the censure does not strip him of any privileges but serves as a public reprimand. Green has indicated he is prepared to face the consequences and plans to continue his opposition to Trump’s policies.[1][4]

Data Points

  • March 4, 2025: Date of President Trump’s joint address to Congress.
  • March 6, 2025: Date of the House vote to censure Rep. Al Green.
  • 2009: Year Rep. Joe Wilson (R-S.C.) was reprimanded for interrupting then-President Barack Obama’s speech.
  • 11 terms: Length of Rep. Al Green’s service in Congress.

The censure of Rep. Al Green underscores the heightened tensions and political divisions within the U.S. Congress. As the political landscape continues to evolve, such incidents will likely remain a focal point in the ongoing struggle for legislative control and ideological influence.