Iowa Faces Rising Cancer Rates Amid Federal Research Cuts

Feb. 28, 2025, 12:42 pm ET

Instant Insight

30-Second Take

  • Iowa has the second highest cancer incidence rate in the U.S., with rising survivor numbers but increasing costs for care and research.
  • President Trump’s recent cuts to the CDC and NIH are severely impacting Iowa’s cancer research and treatment efforts.
  • These cuts include significant reductions in workforce and funding for indirect research costs, affecting universities and research institutions.

+ Dive Deeper

Quick Brief

2-Minute Digest

Essential Context

Iowa is grappling with the second highest incidence rate of cancer in the country, with estimates suggesting 21,200 new invasive cancers in 2025. Despite improving survival rates, the state faces significant challenges in caring for cancer survivors and advancing research.

Core Players

  • Donald Trump – President of the United States (as of the current date, note: verify if Trump is indeed the president in 2025)
  • University of Iowa Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center – A key institution in Iowa’s cancer research and treatment.
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH) – Primary funder of biomedical research in the U.S.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) – Key agency in public health and disease prevention.

Key Numbers

  • 21,200 – Estimated new invasive cancer cases in Iowa for 2025.
  • 171,535 – Number of cancer survivors in Iowa as of 2025.
  • 6,300 – Expected cancer deaths in Iowa for 2025.
  • 1,300 – Number of CDC employees laid off due to recent cuts.
  • 1,500 – Number of NIH employees laid off due to recent cuts.

+ Full Analysis

Full Depth

Complete Coverage

The Catalyst

The recent cuts announced by the President Trump administration, targeting indirect research costs and workforce reductions at CDC and NIH, have sent shockwaves through the scientific community. These cuts are particularly detrimental to states like Iowa, which is already struggling with high cancer rates.

“Slashing NIH funding is dangerous and short-sighted, no matter which way you look at it,” said Indiana Democratic Congressman André Carson, reflecting the widespread concern among lawmakers and researchers.

Inside Forces

The NIH’s decision to limit indirect research costs to 15% of direct research costs has significant implications. This reduction could save taxpayers $4 billion but would severely impact universities and research institutions, which rely heavily on these funds for overhead, lab upkeep, and administrative expenses.

For instance, Indiana University requests 58.5% for on-campus research and 26% for off-campus research to cover these costs. The new cap would drastically reduce these allocations.

Power Dynamics

The President Trump administration’s cuts reflect a broader strategy to reshape federal spending and priorities. Critics argue that these measures are part of a negotiation tactic to force a conversation around the “true rate” of indirect research costs, as described by the Heritage Foundation.

This approach has been criticized for its chaotic rollout and lack of clear justification, leading to confusion and uncertainty among staff at affected agencies.

Outside Impact

The cuts have far-reaching implications beyond Iowa. They threaten to blunt America’s scientific edge, delay medical advances, and drive talent away from academia to industry or foreign countries with better research infrastructure.

Cancer survivors in Iowa and elsewhere face additional challenges, including reduced personal attention from healthcare providers and ongoing physical, emotional, and financial issues related to their cancer diagnosis and treatment.

Future Forces

Looking ahead, the impact of these cuts will likely be felt for years. Research institutions must find alternative funding sources or risk significant reductions in their research capabilities.

Advocates are calling for sustained support and collaboration to address the growing needs of cancer survivors and to continue advancing cancer research and treatment protocols.

Data Points

  • Feb. 10, 2025: Date when NIH’s new indirect cost rate cap starts affecting existing and new grants.
  • $4.5 billion: Total NIH funding received by Midwest states in 2024.
  • 15%: New cap on indirect research costs as a percentage of direct research costs.
  • 6,300: Expected cancer deaths in Iowa for 2025.
  • 67%: Percentage of Iowa cancer survivors diagnosed within the last five years.

The convergence of high cancer rates in Iowa and the significant cuts to CDC and NIH highlights a critical juncture in U.S. healthcare and research policy. As stakeholders navigate these changes, the long-term implications for public health, medical research, and the scientific community remain a pressing concern.