Supreme Court OKs Terrorism Lawsuits Against PLO

Jun. 20, 2025, 12:59 pm ET

Instant Insight

30-Second Take

  • The Supreme Court has revived lawsuits filed by U.S. victims of terrorism attacks against the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and the Palestinian Authority (PA).
  • The court upheld a 2019 law enacted by Congress to allow these lawsuits to proceed.
  • The lawsuits pertain to attacks in the early 2000s and 2018 that killed and injured American citizens.

+ Dive Deeper

Quick Brief

2-Minute Digest

Essential Context

The Supreme Court’s decision on June 20, 2025, allows U.S. victims of terrorism attacks to pursue legal action against the PLO and PA. This ruling is based on a 2019 law passed by Congress aimed at enabling these lawsuits.

Core Players

  • U.S. Supreme Court – The highest court in the United States, which made the ruling.
  • Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) – A Palestinian nationalist organization.
  • Palestinian Authority (PA) – The interim self-government body established to govern parts of the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
  • U.S. Congress – Enacted the 2019 law to facilitate the lawsuits.

Key Numbers

  • $655.5 million – The total damages awarded to the plaintiffs after a jury found the PLO and PA liable, which was later vacated by the Second Circuit.
  • 33 – The number of people killed in the terrorism attacks in the early 2000s.
  • 2019 – The year Congress passed the law to allow these lawsuits.
  • 2004 – The year the initial lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

+ Full Analysis

Full Depth

Complete Coverage

The Catalyst

The Supreme Court’s decision was triggered by the need to address the legal hurdles faced by U.S. victims of terrorism in seeking justice. The 2019 law was specifically enacted to overcome these obstacles.

The law aims to hold foreign entities accountable for their role in terrorism, particularly when such acts affect American citizens.

Inside Forces

The lawsuits stem from a series of terrorism attacks in the early 2000s and a 2018 incident where a U.S.-born settler was killed. The victims and their families argue that Palestinian agents were either involved in or incited these attacks.

The PLO and PA have consistently argued that U.S. courts do not have jurisdiction over these cases, a stance that has been supported by some federal appeals court rulings.

Power Dynamics

The Supreme Court’s ruling shifts the power dynamic in favor of the victims, allowing them to pursue their claims in U.S. courts. This decision underscores the federal government’s commitment to combating international terrorism and providing justice to its citizens.

Congress’s role in enacting the 2019 law highlights the legislative branch’s influence in shaping legal frameworks to address terrorism.

Outside Impact

The ruling has broader implications for international relations and the global fight against terrorism. It sets a precedent for holding foreign entities accountable in U.S. courts, which could influence other countries’ approaches to similar cases.

Human rights and international law experts will closely watch how this decision affects the balance between national security and human rights protections.

Future Forces

Looking ahead, the lawsuits will proceed, and the courts will determine the extent of the PLO and PA’s liability. This could lead to significant financial and reputational consequences for these entities.

The decision may also prompt further legislative actions to strengthen laws against international terrorism and enhance support for victims of such attacks.

Data Points

  • 1985: The killing of American Leon Klinghoffer during a terrorist attack on the Achille Lauro cruise ship, which spurred the passage of the Anti-Terrorism Act in 1992.
  • 2004: The initial lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
  • 2015: A jury found the PLO and PA liable, awarding $218.5 million in damages, which was later trebled to $655.5 million.
  • 2016: The Second Circuit vacated the District Court’s judgment.
  • 2018: A U.S.-born settler was killed in a terrorist attack outside a mall in the West Bank.
  • 2019: Congress passed the law to allow these lawsuits to proceed.

The Supreme Court’s decision marks a significant step in the ongoing effort to provide justice to U.S. victims of terrorism. As the lawsuits move forward, they will continue to shape the legal landscape and international relations.