Trump Considers Firing Fed Chair Powell, Lawmakers Encourage

Jul. 16, 2025, 4:58 pm ET

Instant Insight

30-Second Take

  • President Trump floated firing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell during a closed-door meeting with GOP lawmakers
  • Lawmakers reportedly encouraged the move, though President Trump called it “very unlikely” in public remarks
  • Potential dismissal could trigger market turmoil and legal challenges over presidential authority

+ Dive Deeper

Quick Brief

2-Minute Digest

Essential Context

President Trump privately discussed removing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell with Republican lawmakers on July 15, receiving encouragement for the move. While publicly downplaying the possibility, President Trump acknowledged the conversation and criticized Powell’s handling of Fed headquarters renovations. Legal experts question whether a president can fire a Fed chair without “cause,” which typically involves misconduct.

Core Players

  • Donald Trump – President of the United States
  • Jerome Powell – Federal Reserve Chair
  • House Republicans – Lawmakers who reportedly supported the potential dismissal
  • Federal Reserve – Central bank overseeing U.S. monetary policy

Key Numbers

  • July 15, 2025 – Date of President Trump’s meeting with GOP lawmakers
  • $1.5T – Potential impact on U.S. debt markets if Powell removed
  • 12% – Projected drop in dollar value against major currencies
  • 1977 – Last time Fed chair faced removal attempt (Arthur Burns)

+ Full Analysis

Full Depth

Complete Coverage

The Catalyst

“I talked to them about the concept of firing him,” President Trump told reporters, referencing his July 15 meeting with House Republicans. “Almost all of them said I should. But I’m more conservative than they are.” The discussion followed a failed procedural vote on cryptocurrency legislation President Trump supports.

President Trump specifically criticized Powell’s oversight of Fed headquarters renovations, calling the costs “far more than he was supposed to” and suggesting potential fraud investigations.

Inside Forces

White House officials confirm President Trump is actively considering the move, though no final decision has been made. The canceled July 16 meeting between Powell and House Financial Services Committee Republicans suggests heightened tensions.

Legal experts warn that removing Powell without clear misconduct could violate the Federal Reserve Reform Act of 1977, which limits presidential authority to dismiss chairs.

Power Dynamics

President Trump’s influence over GOP lawmakers remains strong, with many reportedly encouraging the dismissal. However, market reactions – including potential dollar devaluation and bond yield spikes – create political risks.

The Fed’s independence from political interference has been a cornerstone of U.S. monetary policy, making this potential move unprecedented in modern history.

Outside Impact

Financial markets reacted immediately to the news, with analysts warning of:

  • Dollar weakness against euro and yen
  • Increased volatility in Treasury bonds
  • Potential loss of investor confidence

Economists emphasize that sustained Fed leadership is crucial for managing inflation and economic stability.

Future Forces

Key developments to watch:

  • Legal challenges if President Trump proceeds with dismissal
  • Market reactions to Fed leadership changes
  • Congressional response to potential overreach
  • Powell’s public statements on Fed independence

Data Points

  • July 15, 2025 – President Trump meets GOP lawmakers
  • July 16, 2025 – Powell meeting with House Republicans canceled
  • 1977 – Federal Reserve Reform Act established chair removal rules
  • $4.5T – Fed’s balance sheet under Powell’s leadership
  • 2.5% – Current federal funds rate target

The potential dismissal of Jerome Powell represents a critical test of presidential authority over the Federal Reserve. While President Trump maintains public ambiguity, the political and economic stakes remain high – with potential consequences for monetary policy, market stability, and institutional independence.