Trump Would Have Faced Conviction for Election Interference if Not Re-elected, Special Counsel Report Concludes

Jan. 14, 2025, 8:24 pm ET

Instant Insight

30-Second Take

  • Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report concludes that Donald Trump would have been convicted for his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results if he were not reelected as President.
  • Trump’s actions included pressuring state officials, manufacturing fraudulent electoral slates, and forcing Justice Department officials to advance his personal interests.
  • The report highlights Trump’s disregard for the democratic process and his attempts to subvert the lawful transfer of power.

+ Dive Deeper

Quick Brief

2-Minute Digest

Essential Context

Special Counsel Jack Smith’s final report details the extensive efforts by Donald Trump to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. The report underscores that Trump resorted to “criminal efforts” after lawful means of challenging the election results failed.

Core Players

  • Donald Trump – Former president, 2024 Republican frontrunner
  • Jack Smith – Special Counsel investigating Trump’s election interference
  • Merrick Garland – US Attorney General who released the special counsel’s report
  • Justice Department – Conducted the investigation into Trump’s actions

Key Numbers

  • 2020: The year of the presidential election that Trump lost to Joe Biden.
  • 4: The number of felony charges Trump faced, including conspiracy to defraud the United States and obstruction of an official proceeding.
  • 174: The number of pages in the special counsel’s final report.
  • November 25, 2024: The date the special counsel had to dismiss the case against Trump due to his reelection as President.

+ Full Analysis

Full Depth

Complete Coverage

The Catalyst

The special counsel’s report was triggered by Trump’s persistent efforts to challenge the legitimacy of the 2020 election results. When it became clear that he had lost and lawful means of challenging the results had failed, Trump turned to “a series of criminal efforts to retain power.”

Smith’s report emphasizes that “but for Mr. Trump’s election and imminent return to the presidency, the office assessed that the admissible evidence was sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction at trial.”

Inside Forces

Trump’s strategy involved multiple fronts, including pressuring Vice President Mike Pence to refuse to count electoral votes, inducing state officials to ignore true vote counts, and manufacturing fraudulent slates of presidential electors in seven states he had lost.

He also attempted to force Justice Department officials to advance his personal interests by spreading his allegations of election fraud.

Power Dynamics

The report highlights the significant power and influence Trump wielded in his attempts to subvert the democratic process. Despite being informed by various credible actors that he had lost the election, Trump chose to propagate falsehoods about the election’s outcome.

His actions were described as an “unprecedented criminal effort” to overturn the election results.

Outside Impact

The broader implications of Trump’s actions are profound, suggesting a disregard for the democratic process and the rule of law. The report notes that Trump’s efforts disrupted a process that had operated peacefully for over 130 years.

Stakeholders, including legal experts and political analysts, have expressed concern about the long-term effects of such actions on American democracy.

Future Forces

Looking ahead, the dismissal of the case due to Trump’s reelection raises questions about accountability and the rule of law. The Justice Department’s position that it cannot indict a sitting president has significant implications for future investigations into presidential misconduct.

The report’s findings and the subsequent dismissal of the case are likely to influence future legal and political debates about presidential immunity and accountability.

Data Points

  • November 18, 2022: The date the Attorney General appointed Jack Smith as Special Counsel to oversee the investigation.
  • August 1, 2023: The date Trump was charged with four felony offenses related to his efforts to overturn the election.
  • November 25, 2024: The date the special counsel dismissed the case against Trump due to his reelection.
  • January 14, 2025: The date the special counsel’s final report was released.

The special counsel’s report serves as a stark reminder of the critical importance of upholding the rule of law and the democratic process. As the country moves forward, the implications of these findings will continue to shape legal, political, and public discourse.