US Bombs Iranian Nuclear Sites, Causing Major Damage

Jun. 22, 2025, 6:32 pm ET

Instant Insight

30-Second Take

  • The U.S. conducted airstrikes on three key Iranian nuclear sites, including Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan.
  • Satellite imagery shows significant damage but indicates the sites were not completely destroyed.
  • Experts suggest Iran may have moved critical materials before the strikes.

+ Dive Deeper

Quick Brief

2-Minute Digest

Essential Context

On June 22, 2025, the United States launched a military operation, dubbed “Operation Midnight Hammer,” targeting Iran’s nuclear facilities. The strikes, carried out by B-2 Spirit bombers and a U.S. submarine, hit Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, causing extensive damage.

Core Players

  • United States – Conducted the airstrikes as part of Operation Midnight Hammer.
  • Iran – Target of the airstrikes, with key nuclear facilities affected.
  • Israel – Has been conducting its own air campaign against Iranian targets since June 12.
  • IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) – Monitors nuclear activities globally, including Iran’s program.

Key Numbers

  • 14 GBU-57 MOPs (Massive Ordnance Penetrators) – Used in the strikes against Fordow and Natanz.
  • 30,000 pounds – Weight of each GBU-57 MOP bomb.
  • 2,000 centrifuges – Estimated number at Fordow, with approximately half being advanced IR-6 centrifuges.
  • June 12 – Start date of Israel’s air campaign against Iranian targets.

+ Full Analysis

Full Depth

Complete Coverage

The Catalyst

The U.S. airstrikes were a significant escalation in the ongoing conflict, coming just over a week after Israel began its air campaign against Iranian nuclear and military targets on June 12.

“Iran’s key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated,” stated President Trump, though experts argue the facilities were severely damaged but not destroyed.

Inside Forces

The Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant, located in Qom Province, was one of the primary targets. Satellite imagery shows six probable entry-point craters on the site, indicating severe damage. However, initial assessments suggest that Iran may have moved materials and equipment from the site ahead of the strike.

The Natanz nuclear site, another key target, has been hit multiple times by Israeli strikes since June 12, with the IAEA reporting significant damage to several thousand centrifuges.

Power Dynamics

The operation reflects a coordinated effort between the U.S. and Israel to disrupt Iran’s nuclear program. The use of advanced weaponry, such as the GBU-57 MOPs, underscores the strategic importance of these targets.

The strikes also highlight the complex power dynamics in the region, with the U.S. and Israel aligning against Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

Outside Impact

The international community is closely watching the developments, with potential implications for global security and nuclear non-proliferation efforts. The strikes could lead to increased tensions in the Middle East and may prompt reactions from other regional and global powers.

Experts warn that while the strikes have inflicted significant damage, they may not have completely halted Iran’s nuclear program, leaving room for future escalations.

Future Forces

Looking ahead, the situation remains volatile. Iran may seek to retaliate, potentially through proxy forces or cyberattacks. The international community will be monitoring for any signs of escalation.

The long-term impact on Iran’s nuclear capabilities and the broader geopolitical landscape will depend on the effectiveness of the strikes and the responses of all involved parties.

Data Points

  • June 22, 2025 – Date of the U.S. airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities.
  • June 12, 2025 – Start of Israel’s air campaign against Iranian targets.
  • 300 feet – Depth of the underground complex at Fordow.
  • 25 minutes – Duration over which the 14 GBU-57 MOPs were dropped.
  • 7 B-2 Spirit bombers – Involved in the operation, each carrying two GBU-57 MOPs.

The recent airstrikes mark a significant turning point in the conflict, with far-reaching implications for regional and global security. As the situation continues to evolve, it is crucial to monitor both the immediate aftermath and the long-term consequences of these actions.